*    Chapter 7      A Physical Environmental Sketch of the Americas
     
          The potential of wider comparisons between the Americas
     than those of preceding chapters was suggested some years ago
     by the geographer Carl Sauer, a scholar with an impressive
     grasp of specifics as well as a grand view.
     
               In major design the two continents of the New World
               have certain striking resemblances. Both are
               triangular, broad at the north, ending in an acute
               tip at the south.  Both have their great mountains
               at the west, fringing the Pacific Ocean; and hence
               this ocean receives only a minor part of the
               continental drainage.  Both have wide, ancient
               highlands at the east, largely reduced by long-
               continued erosion to hill lands and rolling uplands.
               In both cases, between eastern uplands and western
               mountains, lie great plains, now or in the past
               subject to heavy aggradation from the waste of the
               elevated lands both to the east and west.  A broad
               resemblance may be pointed out between the
               continental position of the Mississippi Basin and
               that of the La Plata, perhaps even between the Great
               Lakes-St. Lawrence and the Amazon Basins.  Thus far,
               an almost identical schematic diagram could be drawn
               for the two continents, suggesting basically similar
               dynamics of crustal modeling [10, p. 320].
     
          Such a "diagram" can indeed stimulate some thought about
     long-term shifts in landmasses and alterations in sea levels
     as well as more easily noticeable processes such as stream
     erosion and deposition.  It can also be the beginning of an
     understanding of resource distribution and natural living
     conditions.  The trends and relationships it shows liven up
     the reading of maps.
     
          This one chapter, of course, could not hope to be a
     systematic physical geography of the Americas.  It may,
     however, help to introduce such a study.  It does contain maps
     of terrain, generalized geological structure, and climate --
     with very clear implications regarding vegetation. These may
     be studied separately for the systematic overviews they
     provide.  More comprehensive information, though, is easily
     available in standard atlases and texts, such as Preston
     James's Latin America or the Regional Geography of Anglo-
     America by C. Langdon White and his colleagues.
     
     FIGURE 7.1.  A satellite photograph of the Americas.  Photo
     courtesy of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
     
     FIGURE 7.2.  Terrain. A basic reference map for the study of
     the Americas.  Its potential when used in conjunction with
     cultural data is exemplified by the correlation of the
     prehistoric cultures of high achievement and the western
     mountainlands of what is now Latin America.  (Base from
     Goode's World Atlas, (c) Rand McNally, 1974.  Content after
     Finch, Vernon C., et al. Elements of Physical Geography.  New
     York: McGraw-Hill, (c) 1957, plate 3; and Sanders, William T.
     and Price, Barbara J. Mesoamerica:  The Evolution of a
     Civilization. New York: Random House, (c) 1968, pp. 50-51.)
     
          Instead, we will attempt to pull together the relevant
     environmental elements into something like the major life
     zones of the Americas.  Demographic and cultural patterns of a
     similar scale will be fitted to them in Chapter 8; actual
     broad themes out of the interaction of people and their
     environment come after that.  We will pan slowly from west to
     east; the order could be different, except that the
     environmental parallelism is emphatic in the west.  The whole
     comparison at this scale may thus, perhaps, be more
     immediately convincing if begun from there.
     
          Sauer's "Thus far" reminds us that in this expanded
     discussion, as in the preceding example studies, similarities
     may be transformed into differences.  Several other cautionary
     signs must be raised as well.  The relationship of people to
     their environment must be seen as bilateral.  A great deal of
     futile argument results from an overemphasis on influence in
     the one direction or the other. Human impact on the
     environment is easily understood; we see it all around us once
     we are sensitive to the indicators.  It has quite rightly
     become a subject of major concern.  European intruders in the
     Americas, bringing their Judeo-Christian ideology with them,
     took a generally aggressive stance toward the natural
     environments they found. They were determined to put what they
     might find to use for their own purposes.  After all, in the
     very first chapter of the Bible God had commanded them: "Be
     fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue
     it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
     fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon
     the earth."  The results are with us now and can be judged in
     various ways.  The native peoples had their own attitudes,
     valued different things, and in some cases at least were
     concerned to preserve a harmony between themselves and nature.
     A reevaluation of their approach for our own times may reveal
     some genuine alternatives.  It may just be that since numbers
     were lower then the stress on the environment was lower too.
     
          Natural environmental influence on human beings is more
     difficult to trace.  A Peruvian professor of medicine examined
     the effect of altitude on man in the Andes and concluded that
     "there is sufficient ground -- on account of research carried
     out to date in the Andes -- to state that a climatic influence
     is at the basis of human form, function and sociological
     behavior" [8, p. 177].   A statement such as that, based on
     what seem carefully gathered and convincingly presented field
     data, is one thing.  The statements of Ellsworth Huntington,
     an environmental determinist, are another.  In his book
     Mainsprings of Civilization he made some astonishing points:
     There is a positive correlation between mental alertness and
     low temperature.  Homicide and sexual promiscuity increase
     with hot weather.  The Dark Ages and the Revival of Learning
     occurred at opposite phases of a long climatic cycle [6, pp.
     343-367].  There may well be something to all this; Huntington
     was no fool.  However, the conceptualization must be refined
     and much more evidence gathered to support it.
     
          It is also useful to remember that between the "man" and
     the "land" of our simplistic formula there is a screen created
     by culture.  We all perceive and evaluate our environments in
     terms of what we have learned and experienced.  As individuals
     and as groups we have our own criteria for differentiating
     between the tolerable and the intolerable, the repulsive and
     the attractive, the useful and the "stuff" that is just in the
     way.  We react to these perceived environments, not to
     anything objectively definable.  Certain types of landscapes
     act as triggers for standard feelings and reactions: deserts,
     mountain ranges, river valleys, the endless Pampa, the hills
     and hollows of the Appalachians, the Brazilian "backlands," or
     a bit of Christmas card New England.  They have become
     symbolic.
     
          And there is one basic substantive problem in the
     comparison of the physical makeup of the Americas.  Their
     symmetry is fundamentally disturbed by the shape and
     orientation of the two continents.  If the two roughly
     triangular landmasses both pointed toward or away from the
     equator, rather than both pointing south, northeastern North
     America and southeastern South America would not be as
     different as they are.  The first is deprived of its Amazonia
     by the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean; the second seems to
     have had its Boreal forests and tundra lopped away.
     
     The Western Mountain System
     
          Anyone who has flown on a clear day across the Canadian
     Rockies or southward from Panama along the major air route to
     Andean cities cannot help being impressed by this spectacular
     mountain system.  It is often designated in part or in its
     entirety as the Cordillera, a word coming from the Spanish
     cuerda, for "cord" (Fig. 7.3).  It is part of the circum-
     Pacific zone of seismic and volcanic activity.
     
          Parallel subregions extend through considerable lengths
     of the system.  Most easily recognizable on any topographic
     relief map are the formidable ranges on its eastern margins.
     The northern and southern extremities are adjacent to highly
     fjorded coastlines; they have a generally jagged outline as
     well as many other features attributable to mountain
     glaciation.  The glaciated portion ends in Vancouver Island in
     the north and the Island of Chiloe in the south.  The
     depressions occupied by the waterways between these two
     islands and the mainland extend as discontinuous lowlands
     southward and northward, all excellent farming areas.  The
     most clearly defined are the Central Valleys of Chile and
     California, with their Mediterranean climates and vegetation.
     The first of these two major food-producing areas contains a
     major population concentration; the second borders on several
     such centers.  The one was characterized until recently by the
     traditional Spanish American hacienda system; the other
     epitomized modern commercialized agriculture.
     
          Of crucial importance in the cultural evolution of the
     Americas are the intermontane plateaus of the Mexican-
     Guatemalan highlands and the Altiplano of the Central Andes,
     two favored areas in which agriculture and urbanism made their
     earliest appearance in the Americas.  They had concentrations
     of Indian population at the time of the Spanish conquest in
     the early sixteenth century. They attracted New World
     colonization and eventually became the cores of modern states.
     Densely occupied now, their large cities are surrounded by
     communities in which Indians are an important if not the
     predominant element of the population.  Although these people
     may live quite close to the cities, they are worlds removed in
     terms of culture and standards of living.
     
     FIGURE 7.3.  The western cordillera.  (Base from Goode's World
     Atlas, (c) Rand McNally, 1974.)
     
     FIGURE 7.4.  Nabesna Glacier in the Wrangell Mountains, near
     the northern extremity of the Cordillera.  National Park
     Service, photo by M. Woodbridge Williams.
     
     FIGURE 7.5.  The grand Teton Mountains, one of the ranges that
     make up the Rocky Mountains, which in turn form the eastern
     ramparts of the Cordillera in North America.
     
          The general continuity of the western mountain system is
     broken in Middle America, by a volcanic zone bisecting Mexico
     at about the latitude of its capital.  Complicated and in
     large part transverse Middle American landmasses, with their
     related islands to the east, elaborate this interruption.
     
          The patterns of climate and vegetation in the mountainous
     area are so complicated that many small-scale maps simply
     label them "undifferentiated."  It is small wonder, since they
     vary in two dimensions.  The altitudinal variation of climate
     and vegetation, with associated variations in cultural
     landscapes, has fascinated geographers and others for a long
     time.  A famous German scholar and traveler, Alexander von
     Humboldt, opened this subject up to investigation in the
     Western world.  He drew profiles of western mountain ranges on
     the basis of barometric measurements and observed the natural
     conditions prevailing at different levels as well as
     settlement, land use, and customs.   Along the sides of some
     of the tropical Latin American volcanoes, like Orizaba in
     Mexico or Chimborazo in Ecuador, are full series of zones,
     from the tropical forested lowlands, home of the rubber
     tappers and shifting cultivators, to the permanent snowfields
     at the top (Fig. 7.7). The mountains of Alaska and southern
     Chile show altitudinal zonation too, but only the upper
     portions of what is seen in the tropics and these are
     complicated by the effects of strong seasonal climatic
     changes.  Snowlines migrate much farther each year in the
     north and south than they do in the tropics.
     
     FIGURE 7.6.  On Lake Todos Los Santos, near Mt. Puntiagudo, in
     the heart of Chile's fishing and hunting country.  This
     extinct volcano is a part of the main eastern Andean range
     where it fringes Chile's little South.  Photo courtesy of Lan-
     Chile Airlines.
     
          The altitudinal zones can perhaps be thought of as a
     series of bows, arrayed in full near the equator, then
     intersecting with the earth's surface in turn as one moves
     north and south.
     
     The Arid Lands
     
          Add horizontal to altitudinal variations in the high
     mountains of the Americas, and these environments become
     complex indeed.  A key to understanding them lies in the bands
     of aridity that diagonally saddle both the western mountains
     of North America and the Andes.  They show up clearly on the
     map of climates (Fig. 7.8), as well as on some pictures of the
     western hemisphere taken from satellites.  The dry areas are
     usually dominated by high-pressure systems and hence are
     seldom obscured by clouds.  They grade equatorward into the
     wet tropics and poleward into moister and colder climates.  As
     a result of the configuration of the continents the Cordillera
     extends into greater climatic extremes in the north than the
     south.
     
     FIGURE 7.7.  Altitudinal zonation on a tropical mountain with
     abundant precipitation.  Variations in cultivated or natural
     plant cover along a tropical mountainside reflect the upward
     decrease in average temperatures and indicate something of the
     complexity of cultural landscapes in terrain of this type.
     (After Finch, Vernon C.. et al. Elements of Physical
     Geography. New York: McGraw-Hill, (c) 1957, p. 202.)
     
     FIGURE 7.8.  Climates of the Americas.  A climatic
     regionalization such as this is probably the most useful
     single aid to the understanding of small-scale natural
     environmental patterns.  (Base from Goode's World Atlas, (c)
     Rand McNally, 1974.  Content after Finch, Vernon C., et al.
     Elements of Physical Geography.  New York:  McGraw-Hill, (c)
     1957, frontispiece.)
     
          The reasons for the presence and form of these deserts
     with their "steppe" and semidesert fringes begin just off the
     coast.   The permanent high-pressure systems contain subsiding
     -- that is, stable -- air masses.  This condition is
     reinforced by the cold waters of the equatorbound Peru and
     California currents.  They cool the air just above, making it
     subside even more.  The whole process produces conditions
     opposite to the rising unstable air required for cloud
     formations and precipitation. On the eastern sides of the
     mountains another control takes over.  This is the rain-shadow
     effect, or simply the effect of a location sheltered from
     moisture-bearing, eastward-moving cyclonic storms.  By the
     time air masses have come up and over the mountains, they are
     literally rained out.  The arid zones are thus drawn eastward
     and poleward.  All these controls are stronger off the
     Peruvian and Chilean coasts than they are off California and
     Mexico, making the Atacama one of the driest deserts in the
     world.  The rain-shadow effect behind the Cordillera is also
     clearer in South America than North America.
     
          Settlements in the arid lands must be at oases and along
     streams or have to be sustained by costly artificial means.
     Movement between them was and still is hazardous.  The most
     delicate and enduring adjustments to this environment have
     been made by the indigenous inhabitants, the Indians. The
     settlements and irrigated agriculture of such groups as the
     Atacamenos along the western slopes of the main Andean range
     in northern Chile and the Hopi oi Arizona are striking
     examples.
     
     FIGURE 7.9.  In the Mojave Desert, a part of the massive arid
     zone that stretches from Baja California northward into the
     interior of the United States.  Photo courtesy of U.S.
     Department of the Interior.
     
          The ghost towns that can also be found in the deserts and
     elsewhere in the Cordillera of the western hemisphere
     represent quite the opposite.  People came in and went away
     again, leaving a scandal.  It may well be that more wealth has
     been generated by the "rushes" after gold, nitrates, or
     whatever, since they have been written about and filmed, than
     was frantically dug out of the ground by the miners
     themselves.
     
          The desert mining town of today is a different place;
     witness the copper mine and support facilities at Chuquicamata
     in Chile or the modern mining towns of the North American
     Southwest.  Environmental adjustments, such as air
     conditioning, are common.   Good transportation routes link
     the settlements with markets, and amenities of all kinds are
     provided.  There is an air of permanence. Even so, it must not
     be forgotten that these settlements too are based on the
     extraction of nonrenewable resources and could become the
     ghost towns of the future.
     
          Nevertheless, desert no longer means desolation in quite
     the way it once did, at least not in North America.  The
     suburbs of Los Angeles or Phoenix have spread out into arid
     country and advertise the fact.  "Desert Acres" or "Sunshine
     Valley" may represent attractive concepts to farmers from the
     Great Plains affluent enough to winter in the Southwest, or to
     those who want to retire in the sun.  Las Vegas and Reno,
     spelled out in lights, have added the fun to the comfort. This
     sort of thing is not much in evidence yet around the cities
     and towns of South American deserts, although Africa, in
     northern Chile, took a leaf out of Nevada's book and included
     a gambling casino in the development program for that port.
     
     FIGURE 7.10.  Navajo Indians near a traditional hogan in
     Monumental Valley, Arizona.  Photo by Josef Muench.
     
     Problems and Possibilities
     
          The western mountain system as a whole has always been a
     barrier.  It must have been that for prehistoric people, who
     in North America at least seem to have migrated mainly along
     its landward side.  North American fur traders as well as
     Brazilian bandeirantes found it hard to penetrate from the
     landward side.   Crossing the mountains remains a problem in
     North and Latin America.   A Canadian thinks of the way in
     which the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway from
     coast to coast, over the Cordillera, helped to unite the
     country.  It enabled Canada to enclose and retain British
     Columbia.  Modern highways, of course, have diminished the
     problem but not eliminated it.  A Chilean might think of the
     spectacular march of San Martin and his army from Argentina
     over the Andes at 14,000 feet to liberate Chile from Spanish
     rule.  A Peruvian would probably note the current difficulties
     of getting from Lima into the tropical lowlands that make up
     about a half of his country's area.  Planes have overcome this
     isolation for the affluent and for high-value freight. A
     gradually improving road network is doing the same for
     ordinary people and their freight.
     
          Although the geologically "young" western mountains of
     both North and Latin America are a barrier to east-west
     movement, they have also long been a source of wealth.  There
     are rich deposits of nonferrous metals, such as tin, copper,
     and of course gold and silver (Fig. 7.11).  (Iron ore is
     scarce; it is found in abundance only at the peripheries of
     the "old" Canadian and Brazilian shields.) The major streams
     flowing out of the mountains now provide hydroelectric power.
     To an increasing extent these mountains have also become a
     recreational resource, especially in North America.
     
     Continental Interiors
     
          Our sweep eastward can be more rapid than the vast
     interior regions would seem to merit because of what has been
     discussed already in the comparisons of the Great Plains and
     the Pampa, Amazonia and the Arctic, Appalachia and the
     Brazilian Northeast.   The purpose must be to perceive
     relationships.  Some immediately become apparent in an outline
     of geological structure and mineralization, both represented
     on Figure 7.11.  Its bold regionalization helps to clarify the
     distribution of several basic resources.
     
          Ancient, stable rocks of the Precambrian "shields" appear
     at or near the surface of most of the northern interiors of
     the two continents.  They have been reduced through long, long
     erosion to a low topography, and further scarred in North
     America by continental glaciation.  In places, particularly
     around the southern rim of the Canadian Shield and in
     southeastern Brazil, these ancient formations rise to several
     thousand feet above sea level.  Human occupation and use of
     the regions have been sparse, but new initiatives are under
     way, as was developed in the comparison of the Arctic and
     Amazonia.
     
     FIGURE 7.11.  Geological Structure and key minerals.  Lists --
     and maps -- of key products have given geography a bad name.
     Nevertheless it is useful to be able to relate, say, copper or
     tin to the development of the appropriate Andean country, and
     to understand something of the distribution of petroleum
     reserves.  An outline of geological zonation helps one make
     sense of the grouping and distribution of the minerals.  (Base
     from Goode's World Atlas, (c) Rand McNally, 1974.  Content
     after Aldine University Atlas, Chicago:  Aldine Publishing
     Co., (c) 1969  George Philip and Son, Ltd. and Der Grosse
     Bertelsman Wetatlas, (c) 1960, pp. 8-9.)
     
          The rich deposits of iron near the Great Lakes, as well
     as in Brazil's Serra da Espinhaco and Venezuela's Cerro
     Bolivar, which is virtually an "iron mountain," are located on
     these ancient shields.  Nonferrous metals, notably gold,
     silver, lead, zinc, and copper, also occur.  In the western
     mountain system just discussed, the second type predominates
     and the first occurs only in several relatively minor
     deposits.  This general but basic distinction is important in
     making sense of mining in the Americas, past and present.
     
          More recent rocks, formed of sediments laid down when the
     continental interiors were repeatedly submerged, overlie
     sections of the shields and extend southward on both
     continents.  Their surface is even flatter, except where
     incised by stream erosion.   The development of two major food-
     producing areas for the Americas and the world on two segments
     of these plains has been sketched in the comparison of the
     Great Plains and the Pampa.
     
          The "old" mountains on the eastern periphery of the North
     American interior lowland, are a rather dramatic series of
     ranges made up of folded sedimentary strata.  Eastern Brazil
     has somewhat analogous highlands, but the topography is more
     complex, the folding not nearly so linear.
     
          These regions of sedimentary rocks and their offshore
     extensions provide the Americas with most of their fossil
     fuels: coal, oil, and gas.  Isolated fields also occur along
     the length of the Cordillera.  As Figure 7.11 shows clearly,
     the deposits are particularly large and well located in North
     America.
     
          The climates of the continental interiors extend in
     generally parallel east-west zones from the Cordillera to the
     eastern coasts, except at the seaward margins of Brazil and in
     the dry belts along the eastern sides of the Cordillera,
     poleward of the 20-degree parallels of latitude (Fig. 7.8).
     The comparability of the Great Plains and Pampa environments
     has been discussed.  The southeastern areas of both continents
     have humid subtropical climates (Caf).
     
          A line traced from the North Pole to New Orleans, over
     the rather bold and abstract but very useful climatic
     boundaries on Figure 7.8, passes from the Arctic tundra
     through progressively warmer and moister zones, from treeless
     areas through needleleaf evergreen Boreal forests, mixed tree
     species, then a patchwork of deciduous forest and grassland,
     and finally needleleaf forests again.  The delta of the
     Mississippi, the whole south coast of the United States, and
     certainly Florida present an introduction to the tropics.
     
          Something similar can be done in the southern hemisphere,
     but with different results.  If we begin at the South Pole and
     move over the climatic map (Fig. 7.8) to Buenos Aires and
     eventually Trinidad, we cross first the polar environment of
     Antarctica, then an expanse of ocean, and pick up on the South
     American continental climatic zones where North America left
     off.   Moisture increases and seasons change from summer and
     winter to wet and dry.  The grassland of the Pampa gives way
     to mixtures of deciduous scrub and evergreen forest species,
     which yield in turn to the Amazonian rain forest.  This
     difference between the eastern sections of the two roughly
     conical continents is perhaps the most striking result of the
     fact that they both point southward rather than toward each
     other across the equator.
     
          As almost any map of the Americas must clearly show, the
     continental interiors are divided into the catchment basins of
     a series of major rivers.  They have provided entry and exit,
     some better than others.  Much of the history of settlement
     and land use in the interiors seems a documentation of
     movement; the net westward trends in population migration, the
     shift of frontiers, and the convergence of elements of
     industrial production come to mind, but more of that in a
     later chapter.
     
     The Eastern Seaboards
     
          The two eastern coastal margins provided beachheads in
     the New World and now sustain heavy population concentrations.
     The arrangement and locational relationships of various
     physical aspects of the seaboards proved critical to the
     occupancy and use of much of the two continents. These regions
     were not dealt with in Part I because differences within and
     between them are substantial.  However, they are comparable in
     some respects and we shall explore these relationships here.
     
     FIGURE 7.12.  The eastern slopes of the Andes in Argentina,
     near Salta -- a part of the arid zone that extends
     southwestward from the Pacific, over the mountains, and down
     their eastern margins.  Photo by EPA Newsphoto.
     
     FIGURE 7.13.  The eastern seaboards.  An approximation of the
     physical settings for the beginnings of European colonization
     in the Americas.  (Base from Goode's World Atlas, (c) Rand
     McNally, 1974. Content after Kuchler, A.W. Goode's World
     Atlas, 13th ed. (c) Rand McNally, 1970, pp. 20-21)
     
          Both coasts are backed by the northeast-southwest-
     trending "old" geologic systems already referred to,
     dramatically linear in North America, more diffuse in South
     America.  The first provides a series of convenient passes
     into the interior, notably the Mohawk River Valley and the
     Cumberland Gap.  The second is more difficult to traverse and,
     in fact, raises an escarpment to block movement from the
     harbors to the interior for much of its length.  The barrier
     is especially formidable behind Rio de Janeiro.  Between the
     mountains and the sea, on both continents, are wedged what are
     often shown as plains on small-scale relief maps -- much wider
     in North America than in South America.
     
          The Atlantic seaboard of the United States has a highly
     irregular coastline of embayments, estuaries, peninsulas, and
     islands, the result of coastal submergence, augmented from New
     York northward by glacial de posits and fringed southward by
     lagoons and barrier beaches.  The plain itself can be divided
     into two bands, the low coastal plain proper underlaid by soft
     sedimentary rocks, with elevations up to several hundred feet,
     and a piedmont of harder crystalline rocks, rising gradually
     toward the mountains, up to about 1500 feet.  Between the two,
     particularly well defined south of New York, is the fall line,
     a line of rapids on the streams crossing from harder to softer
     rocks, where navigation ends and important cities grew up.
     
          The Brazilian coastal plain is less than 100 miles in
     width, for the most part, and irregular in its landward
     margins.  The coast is much smoother in outline than that of
     the eastern United States. However, it does offer a series of
     embayments, sheltered by discontinuous rock reefs running from
     where Brazil's coast bends southward to about 17 degrees south
     latitude.  It is not divided geologically into bands, as is
     the United States seaboard, but is underlain by a variety of
     rock types, which have been molded into low-profile landforms.
     Glaciation, of course, did not occur.
     
     FIGURE 7.14.  In East County, Vermont.  This northern part of
     the Appalachians holds some fundamentally "American" landscape
     imagery.  Photo by David W. Corson from A. Devaney, N.Y.
     
          The climate and related features of the two seaboards
     differ widely.  If either were located farther south, they
     would be much more similar.  The United States seaboard in its
     northern section is a variation on the severely seasonal
     continental pattern moderated sufficiently by its proximity to
     the Atlantic to make freeze-up of waterways unlikely and allow
     cultivation of truck crops.  Moving southward one reaches
     virtually subtropical conditions.  The natural vegetation is a
     combination of deciduous and coniferous forest, mostly long
     since cleared or replaced by succession species.  Soils are
     generally mediocre and require extensive fertilization to
     sustain commercial cropping.
     
          The Brazilian seaboard is fully tropical; from the bulge,
     with its distinct dry season and combinations of forest and
     grassland, conditions change southward into tropical rain
     forest, with precipitation distributed throughout the year.
     Here too the natural vegetation has been almost entirely
     cleared since European colonization and replaced by cultivated
     plants or succession species.  The soils require as careful
     management as any in temperate zones but have in fact been
     seriously impoverished through sustained commercial cropping
     with little fertilization.
     
          The forests of Brazil's coast were first appreciated by
     the European, for their dyewoods.  The soils soon sustained
     widespread plantings of sugar cane.  This and other tropical
     commercial crops, as well as cattle, are still important to
     the country's economy.  The offshore fisheries, forests, and
     manageable soils within easy reach of the developing cities
     have also been and still are of substantial economic
     consequence.   Plantation systems developed on both seaboards
     -- a phenomenon that has often stimulated comparative study.
     
          The main attributes of the physical environment for the
     development -- particularly the urban development -- of the
     two seaboards are locational.  The protected anchorages, but
     more fundamentally the proximity of the seaboards to Europe
     and shipping lanes southward, facilitated the initial landfall
     and the sustenance of the resulting colonies.  Bases were soon
     developed for penetration into the interiors of the
     continents.
     
          The particularly favorable links eastward and westward
     from the United States seaboard allowed for the growth of
     "Megalopolis."  This is an ancient Greek term for a very large
     city which the geographer Jean Gottmann applied to the
     
               almost continuous stretch of urban and suburban
               areas from southern New Hampshire to northern
               Virginia and from the Atlantic shore to the
               Appalachian foothills.  The processes of
               urbanization, rooted deep in the American past, have
               worked steadily here, endowing the region with
               unique ways of life and of land use.  No other
               section of the United States has such a large
               concentration of population, with such a high
               average density, spread over such a large area.
               And no other section has a comparable role within
               the nations or a comparable importance in the world
               [4, p. 3].
     
          Cities grew up along the Brazilian east coast as well.
     With the development of gold-mining in the Brazilian interior
     during late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, and
     the construction of a road over the escarpment, Rio de Janeiro
     became the major one.  Industrialization and modernization
     proceeded, particularly from Rio southwestward toward Sao
     Paulo, but there is as yet no contiguous Megalopolis.
     Brazil's urban core is sometimes presented as a triangle.  Rio
     and Sao Paulo form its base; Brasilia is the apex.  All three
     are closely linked and functionally integrated to a
     considerable extent, but the links to the interior and to
     important foreign trading partners are not as advantageous as
     in eastern North America.
     
     Latin America's Geographical Jinx
     
          Most of Latin America, certainly the Brazilian seaboard
     and South America's cone, is considerably south of where most
     of the world's economic action is: western Europe and the
     eastern United States.  Maps of world surface shipping [e.g.
     9, p. 85] show a thick web of sea-lanes and heavy tonnage
     across the North Atlantic, into the Gulf of Mexico, across the
     Caribbean, and through the Panama Canal.  Routes and tonnage
     are relatively meager south of the equator.  Maps of nonstop
     jet connections strongly reinforce this picture, which
     reflects not only actual economic activity but also the basic
     locational problem and translates into high transportation
     costs.
     
          Northern South America's rivers do not focus large
     interior tributary regions at economically favorable points.
     Just west of Sao Paulo and Rio the rivers flow westward.  In
     addition, movement inland is impeded by the escarpment not far
     from the coast.  Rapids on the Sao Francisco, the one major
     river that does flow to the densely settled eastern coast,
     prevent navigation between the coast and points inland.  The
     Amazon, of course, is a magnificent waterway into the
     interior.  However, the settlements it serves and the economic
     activity it sustains and concentrates are of minor importance
     in the large picture.   The Paraguay-Parana-La Plata system,
     with its shallow channels, shifting course, and frequent:
     flooding is a rather poor transportation route.  Buenos Aires
     must be thought of as a center of overland rail and road
     rather than of inland water transportation.  Elsewhere the
     river systems have only local transportational significance,
     except perhaps the Magdalena of Colombia, but it too presents
     navigational difficulties.  The great Orinoco of Venezuela is
     navigable for only some 400 kilometers from its mouth.
     
          The resources for heavy industry are neither as
     substantial nor as advantageously juxtaposed in Latin as in
     North America.   Large iron deposits are to be found in
     eastern Venezuela and not far behind the Brazilian seaboard;
     smaller deposits, at various points in the Cordillera.  Coal
     deposits are meager and usually quite far away from the iron
     ore.  Fossil fuels in general are not nearly so plentiful.
     Except in southeastern Brazil, both coal and iron ore are long
     distances from where the iron and steel are to be used.  Other
     minerals are often at a similar locational disadvantage.
     
          Nowhere in Latin America is there such a fortunate linkup
     of markets, minerals, fuels, waterways, and other
     transportation routes as exists between North America's Great
     Lakes and the Atlantic seaboard.  This is perhaps the most
     serious environmental deterrent to economic development along
     modern lines.
     
          It has been said that the Latin Americans have had less
     to work with than the North Americans.  A Chilean writer
     maintained some years ago:  "Everything has favoured you.... A
     fruitful nature and an infinite expanse of virgin lands
     multiplied your efforts" [1, p. 459].  This comment can be and
     often is countered by North Americans with invidious
     comparisons on the way Latin Americans have used what is
     theirs.  More tactful -- and constructive -- is the premise
     that it was neither natural resource endowment nor cultural
     equipment that led the two Americas into their current
     socioeconomic situations, but a sequence of historical
     circumstances.
     
     An Ecological Postscript
     
          The Americas were long thought to have bountiful, even
     limitless, natural environments; these have recently come to
     appear more and more precarious.  Examples of stress and
     reasons for concern have already been noted in the five sets
     of detailed comparisons.  Soils have been diminished through
     exhaustion, erosion, and leaching, especially in the long and
     densely settled highlands of Latin America, as well as in the
     problem areas of both Latin and North America.  The end of
     some mineral reserves and fossil fuel deposits is in sight.
     The atmosphere above the large cities is opaque.  Many streams
     have become sewers; lakes are choking with weeds.  Forests are
     in retreat, and whole species of flora and fauna are in danger
     of eradication.
     
          The literature on all this is bedeviled by problems of
     definition and incomplete data, by alarmism as much as
     complacency.  Resentful comparisons pass back and forth
     between the Americas on resource management.  North Americans
     are wasting energy; Latin Americans paying little attention to
     sustained yield in their forestry operations.  It does seem
     clear that detrimental human-induced environmental change
     threatens the life-style of the "haves" and the aspirations of
     the "have-nots."
     
          The worldwide discussion of ecological problems has
     produced some dramatic north-south confrontations within the
     Americas, as it has between "developed" and "developing"
     countries generally.   Representatives of the latter often
     maintain that environmental concern is a luxury of the rich
     nations.  Talk by the people from developed countries of the
     need for population control is seen as a conspiracy to promote
     neocolonialism.  It is feared, moreover, that the costs of
     environmental protection in developed countries will be passed
     on to the developing world in the prices for manufactured
     goods.  However, the evidence for actual or potential
     environmental deterioration in the developing countries is
     gradually becoming strong enough to temper these views.
     
          The developing countries must continue to place economic
     development first.  They seem to have no choice but to
     industrialize; after all, poverty is the worst "pollution."
     The contemplation of "no-growth" policies would be frivolous
     if not cruel.  Environmental protection can be considered to
     the extent that it does not hamper this primary goal.  Some
     countries, particularly Brazil, have taken the official
     position that development and preservation of the environment
     are not incompatible. There is no doubt that herein lies one
     of the greatest modern challenges to human ingenuity.
     
     References
     
     1.   Bilbao, Francisco. "America en Peligro." In Keen, B.,
     Readings in Latin American Civilization. Boston: Houghton
     Mifflin, 1955.
     
     2.   Claiborne, Robert. Climate, Man and History. New York:
     Norton, 1970.
     
     3.   Finch, Vernon C., et al. Elements of Physical Geography.
     New York: McGraw-Hill, 1957.
     
     4.   Gottmann, Jean. Megalopolis. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.
     Press, 1961.
     
     5.   Hewitt, K., and Hare, F. K. Man and Environment.
     Commission on College Geography, Resource Paper No. 20.
     Washington: Association of American Geographers, 1973.
     
     6.   Huntington, E. Mainsprings of Civilization. New York:
     Wiley, 1945.
     
     7.   James, Preston. Latin America. New York: Odyssey. 1969.
     
     8.   Monge, C. Acclimatization in the Andes. Baltimore: Johns
     Hopkins Press, 1948.
     
     9.   Oxford Economic Atlas. London: Oxford University Press,
     1972.
     
     10.  Sauer, C. "Geography of South America." Handbook of South
     American Indians (Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American
     Ethnology, Bulletin 143) 6 (1950): 319-543.
     
     11.  Schmieder, Oskar. Die Neue Welt: Mittel und Suidamerica.
     Heidelberg: Keyserische, 1962.
     
     12.  Sternberg, H. O'R. "Man and Environmental Change in Latin
     America." In Fittkan, E. J., et al., Biogeography and Ecology
     in South America. The Hague: Junk, 1968. Pp.413-445
     
     13.  Troll, C. Die tropischen Gebirge. Bonn: Dummlers. 1959.
     
     14.  White, C. Langdon, Foscue, Edwin J., and McKnight, Tom L.
     Regional Geography of Anglo-America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
     Prentice-Hall, 1964.
  


Back to Table of Contents